Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Volume 19, Issue 4 , Pages 277-283, August 2006

Stage of Change Behavioral Assessment Tool Fails to Predict the Prevalence of Chlamydia in an Urban Adolescent Health Clinic

  • Andrea R. Kasowitz, BA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City
  • ,
  • Mark McCusker, BA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City
  • ,
  • Patricia Coury-Doniger, FNPC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
  • ,
  • Wendy P. Neal, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City
  • ,
  • Debbie Indyk, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Community Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City
  • ,
  • Robert D. Burk, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein Medical College, Bronx
  • ,
  • Stephen G. Jenkins, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City
  • ,
  • Vaughn I. Rickert, PsyD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City
  • ,
  • Betsy C. Herold, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Betsy C. Herold, MD, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1657, New York, NY 10029

Abstract 

Study Objective

Strategies to reduce STI among adolescents and young adults have failed to consistently demonstrate effectiveness. A universal approach may not be appropriate because individuals are at different stages with respect to self-management behaviors. Thus, the Stage of Change Transtheoretical Model has been advocated. This study was conducted to determine whether staging could be accomplished in an urban adolescent clinic and whether it provides a tool to predict STI risk.

Design

Participants were interviewed and staged according to a standardized instrument with respect to sexual risk behaviors and contraceptive use.

Setting

Urban adolescent health clinic.

Participants

103 females (ages 18–24).

Interventions

A physical examination and diagnostic tests for syphilis, HSV, HCV, chlamydia, gonorrhea and HPV were performed.

Main Outcome Measures

Stages for behaviors to reduce STI risk and to utilize contraception and STI prevalence.

Results

78% of the participants were in the three earliest stages of behavior (precontemplative, contemplative, and ready for action) with respect to condom use for STI prevention; conversely only 47% were in early stages with respect to birth control practices. Of the participants tested, 12/81 (15%) had chlamydial infection detected by molecular techniques, whereas no participants had gonorrhoeae. Among the subset tested for HPV DNA, 18/45 (40%) were positive. The diagnostic behavior stage for STI prevention did not correlate with the presence of chlamydia.

Conclusions

A staging instrument can be implemented into adolescent health clinic practice, but cannot be used as a risk assessment tool for the presence of chlamydia. Additionally females are more likely to protect themselves against pregnancy than against an STI.

Key Words: Stage of Change Transtheoretical Model (SOC/TTM), STI, Chlamydia, Birth control

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1083-3188(06)00161-6

doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2006.05.003

Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Volume 19, Issue 4 , Pages 277-283, August 2006