Abstract
Background
Objective
Design
Results
Conclusions
Key Words
Level of Evidence
Grading of recommendations
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent GynecologyReferences
- Mullerian anomalies.Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2009; 36: 47
- Genetics of the female reproductive ducts.Am J Med Genet. 1999; 89: 224
- Identification and functional analysis of a new WNT4 gene mutation among 28 adolescent girls with primary amenorrhea and müllerian duct abnormalities: a French collaborative study.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008; 93: 895
- Genetic basis for the development of mullerian abnormalities: a review of current evidence.Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 5: 7
- The role of genes in the development of Mullerian anomalies, where are we today?.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2009; 64: 760
- Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification. (An analysis of 144 cases).Fertil Steril. 1979; 32: 40
- The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system.Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17: 1
- A population-based study of the incidence of Mullerian aplasia in Finland.Fertil Steril. 2001; 76: 624
- The MURCS association: Mullerian duct aplasia, renal aplasia, and cervicothoracic somite dysplasia.J Pediatr. 1979; 95: 399
- Vaginal malformations.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 141: 910
- Uterine remnants and pelvic pain in females with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013; 26: 199
- Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome–a review.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2008; 21: 305
- Vaginal Surgery for congenital anomalies.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 53: 115
- Assessing congenital uterine anomalies: the role of three-dimensional ultrasonography.Best Pract Resh Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 18: 29
- Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: sexuality, psychological effects, and quality of life.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009; 22: 339
- International Consensus Conference on Intersex organized by the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society and the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology: Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders, International Consensus Conference on Intersex.Pediatrics. 2006; 118: e488
- (Letter to Editor) Formation of a neovagina by coitus.Obstet Gynecol. 1972; 40: 763
- Creation of a vagina by repeated coital dilatation in four teenagers with vaginal agenesis.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000; 79: 149
- The formation of an artificial vagina without operation.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1938; 35: 1053
- Management of vaginal agenesis.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012; 25: 352
- Committee opinion: no: 562: müllerian agenesis: diagnosis, management, and treatment.Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121: 1134
- Should progressive perineal dilation be considered first line therapy for vaginal agenesis?.J Urol. 2009; 182: 1882
- Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: a review of 245 consecutive cases managed by a multidisciplinary approach with vaginal dilators.Fertil Steril. 2012; 97: 686
- Vaginal agenesis, the hymen, and associated anomalies.J Pediatr Adoles Gynecol. 2012; 25: 54
- Early prolapse of a neovagina created with self-dilatation and treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension in a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome: a case report.Fertil Steril. 2010; 93: 267.e1
- Vaginal creation for mullerian agenesis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185: 1349
- Systematic review of sexual function and satisfaction following the management of vaginal agenesis.Int Urogynecol J. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2316
- Sexual function in women treated with dilators for vaginal agenesis.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2005; 18: 39
- Long-term results after operative correction of vaginal aplasia.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 617
- Emotional and sexual wellness and quality of life in women with Rokitansky syndrome.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205: 117.e1
- Treatment of Congenital Malformations.Semin Reprod Med. 2011; 29: 101
- The laparoscopic Vecchietti technique for vaginal agenesis.Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007; 98: 15
- The laparoscopic Vecchietti’s modified technique in Rokitansky syndrome: anatomic, functional, and sexual long-term results.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198: 377
- Sexual function after modified laparoscopic Vecchietti’s vaginoplasty.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011; 24: 147
- Neovagina creation in vaginal agenesis: development of a new laparoscopic Vecchietti-based procedure and optimized instruments in a prospective comparative interventional study in 101 patients.Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: 1940
- History of attempts to form a vagina.Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977; 59: 319
- Sheares’ method of vaginoplasty - our experience.J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2011; 4: 118
- Creation of a neovagina according to Wharton-Scheares-George in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome.Fertil Steril. 2005; 83: 437
- Creation of a neovagina by Davydov’s laparoscopic modified technique in patients with Rokitansky syndrome.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202: 33.e1
- Sexuality and psychosocial functioning in young women after colovaginoplasty.J Urol. 2010; 184: 1799
- Sexual function following bowel vaginoplasty.J Urol. 2006; 175: 2283
- Vaginal aplasia and reconstructruction.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 24: 185
- Timing of gonadectomy in adult women with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS): patient preferences and clinical evidence.Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012; 76: 894
- Evaluation of retained testes in adolescent girls and women with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome.Radiology. 2013; 268: 153
- Sexual life and sexual wellness in individuals with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) and Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome (MRKHS).J Sex Med. 2014; 11: 729
- Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 38: 371
- Reproductive impact of congenital Mullerian anomalies.Hum Reprod. 1997; 12: 2277
- Ultrastructural aspects of endometrium in infertile women with septate uterus.Fertil Steril. 1996; 65: 750
- Small uterine septum is an important risk variable for preterm birth.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007; 135: 154
- Congenital uterine anomalies and adverse pregnancy outcomes.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205: 558.e1
- Pregnancy associated with congenital abnormalities of the female reproductive tract.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1952; 63: 744
- Longitudinal vaginal septum.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1982; 13: 253
- Type of uterine anomaly and adverse pregnancy outcomes.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014; 27: 949
- Hysteroscopic metroplasty for the septate uterus: review and meta-analysis.J Min Invasive Gynecol. 2013; 20: 22
- Rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy. The 20th-century worldwide experience of 588 cases.J Reprod Med. 2002; 47: 151
- The presentation and early diagnosis of the rudimentary uterine horn.Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105: 1456
- Is hysterosalpingography able to diagnose all uterine malformations correctly? A retrospective study.Eur J Radiol. 2005; 53: 274
- Differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus by sonohysterography eliminates the need for laparoscopy.Fertil Steril. 2002; 78: 176
- Hysteroscopic treatment of the uterine septum: a clinician’s experience.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182: 1414
- Complete septate uterus with longitudinal vaginal septum.Fertil Steril. 2006; 85: 700
- Longitudinal vaginal septum: a retrospective study of 202 cases.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997; 74: 197
- The diagnosis and reproductive outcome after surgical treatment of the complete septate uterus, duplicated cervix and vaginal septum.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190: 1669
- Reproductive prognosis after hysteroscopic metroplasty in 102 women: life-table analysis.Fertil Steril. 1993; 59: 768
- Pregnancy outcomes in unicornuate uteri: a review.Fertil Steril. 2009; 91: 1886
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
This Clinical Recommendation has been prepared under the direction of the NASPAG Education Committee, and reviewed by the NASPAG Board and JPAG editors
Committee Opinion NASPAG 2014
The authors indicate no conflicts of interest.
The authors would like to thank Marc Laufer, MD, for conducting the expert review for this document.
The information contained in this Clinical Recommendation reflects the currently available best evidence for practice at the time of publication. The information is designed to aid practitioners in making decisions about appropriate patient care, but should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure. Variations in practice may be warranted based on the needs of the individual patient, resources, and limitations unique to the institution or type of practice. This information has been reviewed and approved by the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology.