Advertisement
Case Report| Volume 31, ISSUE 5, P528-532, October 2018

Download started.

Ok

Bladder Mucosal Graft Vaginoplasty: A Case Report

      Abstract

      Background

      Female vaginoplasty reconstruction, by choice, is usually performed with adjacent tissue. However in some clinical conditions such as high urogenital confluence sinus, cloacal malformation with extreme vaginal hypoplasia, local tissue may not be available. When vaginal replacement is performed in pediatric patients intestinal segments is preferred to non-operative procedures that require continuative dilations. However mucus production, malignant transformation risk and diversion colitis are important side effects.

      Technique

      We present a nouvel technique for vaginoplasty in a female child presenting with an isolated urogenital sinus malformation without virilization. The patient at 20 months underwent vaginoplasty using tubularized bladder mucosal graft.

      Results

      Surgical procedure was devoid of complications. Pubertal development occurred at age of 15. She underwent regular follow up until 18 years of age. At this age we performed clinical evaluation: absence of vaginal introitus stenosis and good cosmetic results were observed. Then she underwent vaginoscopy with multiple biopsies. Pathology examination of the bladder mucosal graft evidenced a normal structure of the mucosa, with a stratified squamous epithelium.

      Discussion

      Different techniques are taken into account for vaginal reconstruction according to the severity and to the type of malformation. We describe the use of bladder mucosal graft with favorable results after long term follow-up.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ruggieri G.
        • Gargano T.
        • Antonellini C.
        • et al.
        Vaginal malformations: a proposed classification based on embryological, anatomical and clinical criteria and their surgical management (an analysis of 167 cases).
        Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2012; 28: 797-803
        • Guarino N.
        • Scommegna S.
        • Majore S.
        • et al.
        Vaginoplasty for disorders of sex development.
        Front. Endocrinol. 2013; 4: 29
        • Rink R.C.
        • Metcalfe P.D.
        • Kaefer M.A.
        • et al.
        Partial uro genital mobilization: a limited proximal dissection.
        J. Pediatr. Urol. 2006; 2: 351-356
        • Samuelson M.L.
        • Baker L.A.
        Autologous buccal mucosa vulvovaginoplasty for high urogenital sinus.
        J. Pediatr. Urol. 2006; 2: 486-488
        • Vatsa R.
        • Bharti J.
        • Roy K.K.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of amnion in creation of neovagina in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome.
        Fertil. Steril. 2017; 108: 341-345
        • Hughes I.A.
        • Houk C.
        • Ahmed S.F.
        • et al.
        Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders.
        Arch. Dis. Child. 2006; 91: 554-563
        • American Academy of Pediatrics
        Timing of elective surgery on the genitalia of male children with particular reference to the risks, benefits, and psychological effects of surgery and anaesthesia.
        Pediatrics. 1996; 97: 590e4
        • Keating M.A.
        • Cartwright P.C.
        • Duckett J.W.
        Bladder mucosa in urethral reconstructions.
        J. Urol. 1990; 144: 827-834
        • Fairbanks J.L.
        • Sheldon C.A.
        • Khoury A.E.
        Free bladder mucosal graft biology: unique engraftment characteristics in rabbits.
        J. Urol. 1992; 148: 663-666
        • Sanders A.R.
        • Schein C.J.
        • Orkin L.A.
        Total mucosal denudation of the canine bladder: experimental observations and clinical implications. Final report.
        J. Urol. 1958; 79: 63-77
        • Claret I.
        • Castañón M.
        • Rodó J.
        • et al.
        Neovagina con injerto libre de mucosa vesical (técnica original de Claret); Libro de Actas del XXVIII.
        Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Cirugía Pediátrica, Lloret de Mar, Spain1988: 40
        • Martinez-Mora J.
        • Isnard R.
        • Castellvi A.
        • et al.
        Neovagina in vaginal agenesis: surgical methods and long term results.
        J. Ped. Surg. 1992; 27: 10-14
        • Saez S.
        • Martin P.M.
        Evidence of estrogen receptors in the trigone area of human urinary bladder.
        J. Steroid Biochem. 1981; 15: 317-320
        • Iosif C.S.
        • Batra S.C.
        • Astedt B.
        Estrogen receptors in the human female lower urinary tract.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1981; 141: 817-820
        • Batra S.C.
        • Iosif C.S.
        Progesterone receptors in the human female lower urinary tract.
        J. Urol. 1987; 138: 1301-1304
        • Jessel R.H.
        • Laufer M.R.
        Management of Lower Vaginal Agenesis in a Patient with Unicornuate Uterus.
        J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2013; 26: 21-23
        • Fortunoff S.
        • Lattimer J.K.
        • Edson M.
        Vaginoplasty technique for female pseudohermaphrodites.
        Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1964; 18: 545-548
        • Passerini-Glazel G.
        Feminizing genitoplasty.
        J.Urol. 1999; 161: 1592-1593
        • Pena A.
        Total urogenital mobilization–an easier way to repair cloacas.
        J. Pediatr. Surg. 1997; 32 (discussion 267–268): 263-267
        • De Filippo R.E.
        • Yoo J.J.
        • Atala A.
        Engeneering of vaginal tissue in vivo.
        Tissue Eng. 2003; 9: 301-306