Advertisement
Original Study| Volume 32, ISSUE 2, P175-181, April 2019

Emergency Contraception Use in School-Based Health Centers: A Qualitative Study

Published:October 26, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2018.10.005

      Abstract

      Study Objective

      To understand contraceptive behaviors and decision-making in school-based health center (SBHC) female patients who have used emergency contraception (EC).

      Design

      Qualitative interviews and questionnaires.

      Setting

      SBHCs.

      Participants

      Female adolescents, who self-reported EC use, were recruited from SBHCs.

      Interventions

      Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached on the following themes: reasons for selecting EC, perceived EC efficacy, reasons for use, nonuse, or inconsistent use of nonemergent contraception (NEC), and beliefs surrounding pregnancy risk.

      Main Outcome Measures

      The team used a modified grounded theory approach and open coding technique to identify common themes. Participants completed a questionnaire to assess demographic information and EC knowledge.

      Results

      Twenty-eight interviews were completed. Reasons for using EC include not using another contraceptive method, using another method incorrectly, or in combination with another method for added protection. Reasons for EC preference include ease of administration, ease of access, minimal side effects, perceived high efficacy, and because it can be used discreetly. Use of NEC was supported by identifying it as more effective, increased sexual experience and anticipation of sex, belief that excess EC decreases efficacy or is detrimental to health, and social interactions. Participants reported having used EC a mean of 3.5 times. Eighteen of 28 participants (65%) incorrectly believed that EC is 90%-99% effective, and 15 of 28 participants (53%) correctly identified ovulation inhibition as the mechanism of action.

      Conclusion

      EC use is promoted by ease of access and administration, experiencing minimal side effects, and perceived high efficacy. Compliance issues with NEC and condoms and a desire for a discreet contraceptive method support EC use.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kearney M.S.
        • Levine P.B.
        Why is the teen birth rate in the United States so high and why does it matter?.
        J Econ Perspect J Am Econ Assoc. 2012; 26: 141
      1. Kaplan D: Teen sexual and reproductive health in New York City. Citizens' Committee for Children of NY policy briefing October 23, 2013. Available: https://www.cccnewyork.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/DOHMHPresentation.pdf. Accessed September 26, 2016.

        • Martinez G.
        • Abma J.
        Sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing of teenagers aged 15-19 in the United States. Report No 209.
        National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD2015
        • Sidebottom A.
        • Harrison P.A.
        • Donna A.
        • Finnegan K.
        The varied circumstances prompting requests for emergency contraception at school-based clinics.
        J Sch Health. 2008; 78: 258-263
        • Trussell J.
        • Raymond E.
        • Cleland K.
        Emergency contraception: a last chance to prevent unintended pregnancy.
        Contemp. Readings. L Soc. Just. 2014; 6
        • Ho P.C.
        Emergency contraception: methods and efficacy.
        Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 12: 175
      2. Reproductive Health Access Project: Your birth control choices. Available: Available: https://www.reproductiveaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/contra_choices.pdf. Accessed December 4, 2017.

        • Glaser B.
        Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis.
        Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA1992
      3. Reproductive Health Access Project: Emergency contraception: which EC is right for me?. Available: Available: http://www.reproductiveaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/emergency-contraception.pdf. Accessed September 26, 2017.

        • Lunde B.
        • Littman L.
        • Stimmel S.
        • et al.
        “Just wear dark underpants mainly”: learning from adolescents’ and young adults’ experiences with early discontinuation of the contraceptive implant.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017; 30: 395
        • Raymond E.G.
        • Shochet T.
        • Drake J.K.
        • et al.
        What some women want? On-demand oral contraception.
        Contraception. 2014; 90: 105
        • Daley A.M.
        • Sadler L.S.
        • Reynolds H.D.
        Tailoring clinical services to address the unique needs of adolescents from the pregnancy test to parenthood.
        Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013; 43: 71
        • Davis A.
        Contraceptive choices: the adolescent years.
        Dialogues Contracept. 1995; 4: 14
        • Cwiak C.
        • Howard B.
        • Hsieh J.
        • et al.
        Sexual and contraceptive behaviors among adolescents requesting emergency contraception.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016; 29: 643
      4. Committee on Adolescent Health Care: Committee opinion no. 710: counseling adolescents about contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130: e74
      5. School Based Health Alliance: 2013-14 census of school-based health centers: methodology, key report data details, and acknowledgements. Available: Available: http://www.sbh4all.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2013-14-Census-Data-and-Methods.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2018.

        • Ethier K.A.
        • Dittus P.J.
        • DeRosa C.J.
        • et al.
        School-based health center access, reproductive health care, and contraceptive use among sexually experienced high school students.
        J Adolesc Health. 2011; 48: 562
        • Mollen C.J.
        • Barg F.K.
        • Hayes K.L.
        • et al.
        Assessing attitudes about emergency contraception among urban, minority adolescent girls: an in-depth interview study.
        Pediatrics. 2008; 122: e395
        • Gilliam M.L.
        • Davis S.D.
        • Neustadt A.B.
        • et al.
        Contraceptive attitudes among inner-city African American female adolescents: barriers to effective hormonal contraceptive use.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009; 22: 97
        • Neustadt A.
        • Holmquist S.
        • Davis S.
        • et al.
        Sexual, relationship, contraceptive and personal factors influencing emergency contraception use: a qualitative study.
        Contraception. 2011; 84: 266
        • Yen S.
        • Parmar D.D.
        • Lin E.L.
        • et al.
        Emergency contraception pill awareness and knowledge in uninsured adolescents: high rates of misconceptions concerning indications for use, side effects, and access.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015; 28: 337