NASPAG Position Statement| Volume 32, ISSUE 6, P563-566, December 2019

Crisis Pregnancy Centers in the United States: Lack of Adherence to Medical and Ethical Practice Standards; A Joint Position Statement of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine and the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

Published:October 28, 2019DOI:


      Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) attempt to dissuade pregnant people from considering abortion, often using misinformation and unethical practices. While mimicking health care clinics, CPCs provide biased, limited, and inaccurate health information, including incomplete pregnancy options counseling and unscientific sexual and reproductive health information. The centers do not provide or refer for abortion or contraception but often advertise in ways that give the appearance that they do provide these services without disclosing the biased nature and marked limitations of their services. Although individuals working in CPCs in the United States have First Amendment rights to free speech, their provision of misinformation might be harmful to young people and adults. The Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine and North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology support the following positions: (1) CPCs pose risk by failing to adhere to medical and ethical practice standards; (2) governments should only support health programs that provide accurate, comprehensive information; (3) CPCs and individuals who provide CPC services should be held to established standards of ethics and medical care; (4) schools should not outsource sexual education to CPCs or other entities that do not provide accurate and complete health information; (5) search engines and digital platforms should enforce policies against misleading advertising by CPCs; and (6) health professionals should educate themselves, and young people about CPCs and help young people identify safe, quality sources of sexual and reproductive health information and care.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Santelli J.S.
        • Grilo S.A.
        • Lindberg L.D.
        • et al.
        Abstinence-only-until-marriage policies and programs: an updated position paper of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine.
        J Adolesc Health. 2017; 61: 400
        • Santelli J.S.
        • Kantor L.M.
        • Grilo S.A.
        • et al.
        Abstinence-only-until-marriage: an updated review of US policies and programs and their impact.
        J Adolesc Health. 2017; 61: 273
        • Lin V.
        • Dailard C.
        Crisis pregnancy centers seek to increase political clout, secure government subsidy.
        Guttmacher Rep Public Policy. 2002; 5: 4
        • Holtzman B.
        Have crisis pregnancy centers finally met their match: California’s Reproductive Fact Act.
        Northwest J Law Soc Policy. 2017; 12: 78
        • Swartzendruber A.
        • Newton-Levinson A.
        • Feuchs A.E.
        • et al.
        Sexual and reproductive health services and related health information on pregnancy resource center websites: a statewide content analysis.
        Womens Health Issues. 2018; 28: 14
        • Rosen J.D.
        The public health risks of crisis pregnancy centers.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 44: 201
        • Bryant-Comstock K.
        • Bryant A.G.
        • Narasimhan S.
        • et al.
        Information about sexual health on crisis pregnancy center web sites: accurate for adolescents?.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016; 29: 22
        • Hussey L.S.
        Crisis pregnancy centers, poverty, and the expanding frontiers of American abortion politics.
        Politics Policy. 2013; 41: 985
      1. Crisis pregnancy center map.
        Date accessed: September 10, 2018
        • Kelly K.
        In the name of the mother: renegotiating conservative women’s authority in the crisis pregnancy center movement.
        Signs. 2012; 38: 203
        • Munson Z.W.
        The Making of Pro-life Activists: How Social Movement Mobilization Works.
        University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL2008
        • Kimport K.
        • Dockray J.P.
        • Dodson S.
        What women seek from a pregnancy resource center.
        Contraception. 2016; 94: 168
        • Ahmed A.
        Informed decision making and abortion: crisis pregnancy centers, informed consent, and the First Amendment.
        J Law Med Ethics. 2015; 43: 51
      2. United States House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce: April 12, 2019 Letter to Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Alex Azar.
        • Rubin R.
        At “crisis pregnancy centers,” critics say, ideology trumps evidence.
        JAMA. 2018; 320: 425
        • Bryant A.G.
        • Narasimhan S.
        • Bryant-Comstock K.
        • et al.
        Crisis pregnancy center websites: information, misinformation and disinformation.
        Contraception. 2014; 90: 601
        • Bryant A.G.
        • Swartz J.J.
        Why crisis pregnancy centers are legal but unethical.
        AMA J Ethics. 2018; 20: 267
        • Bryant A.G.
        • Levi E.E.
        Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina.
        Contraception. 2012; 86: 752
        • Swartzendruber A.
        • Steiner R.J.
        • Newton-Levinson A.
        Contraceptive information on pregnancy resource center websites: a statewide content analysis.
        Contraception. 2018; 98: 158
        • Kelly K.
        The spread of “post abortion syndrome” as social diagnosis.
        Soc Sci Med. 2014; 102: 18
        • Felice M.E.
        • Feinstein R.A.
        • Fisher M.
        • et al.
        Counseling the adolescent about pregnancy options.
        Pediatrics. 1998; 101: 938
        • Gavin L.
        • Moskosky S.
        • Carter M.
        • et al.
        Providing quality family planning services.
        MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014; 63: 1
      3. National Academies of Sciences Engineering, and Medicine: The safety and quality of abortion care in the United States. National Academies Press, Washington, DC2018
        • Grossman D.
        • White K.
        • Harris L.
        • et al.
        Continuing pregnancy after mifepristone and “reversal” of first-trimester medical abortion: a systematic review.
        Contraception. 2015; 92: 206
      4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Facts are important: medication abortion “reversal” is not supported by science.