Review Article| Volume 33, ISSUE 6, P619-622, December 2020

Hot Topics in Social Media and Reproductive Health


      Today's generation of adolescents and young adults have been labeled “digital natives” given that they have had access to digital technology since birth. In this review, we address 2 critical areas affecting adolescents' reproductive health and social media. First, we address the current state of the science across several “hot topic” areas of social media use, including body image and privacy concerns. Second, we shift to consider social media as a potential health education tool in the area of reproductive health. Throughout this review, we attend to gender differences for these topics, including differences between males and females as well as differences between cis and trans adolescents. Our goal is for this review to provide a timely update for providers caring for today's digital natives.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Anderson M.
        • Jiang J.
        Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018.
        Pew, Washington, DC2018
        • Duggan M.
        • Brenner J.
        Demographics of Social Media Users—2012.
        Pew Research Center, Washington, DC2013
        • Duggan M.
        • Ellison N.B.
        • Lampe C.
        • et al.
        Social Media Update 2014.
        Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC2014
        • Lenhart A.
        Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview 2015.
        Pew Research Center, Washington, DC2015
        • Ellison N.B.
        • Steinfield C.
        • Lampe C.
        The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students' use of online social network sites.
        J Comp Mediated Commun. 2007; 12: 1143
        • Levenson J.C.
        • Shensa A.
        • Sidani J.E.
        • et al.
        The association between social media use and sleep disturbance among young adults.
        Prev Med. 2016; 85: 36
        • Blass E.M.
        • Anderson D.R.
        • Kirkorian H.L.
        • et al.
        On the road to obesity: television viewing increases intake of high-density foods.
        Physiol Behav. 2006; 88: 597
        • Wahnschaffe A.
        • Haedel S.
        • Rodenbeck A.
        • et al.
        Out of the lab and into the bathroom: evening short-term exposure to conventional light suppresses melatonin and increases alertness perception.
        Int J Mol Sci. 2013; 14: 2573
        • Ybarra M.L.
        • Mitchell K.J.
        How risky are social networking sites? A comparison of places online where youthsexual solicitation and harassment occurs.
        Pediatrics. 2008; 121: e350
        • Eisenberg M.E.
        • Ackard D.M.
        • Resnick M.D.
        • et al.
        Casual sex and psychological health among young adults: is having “friends with benefits” emotionally damaging?.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009; 41: 231
        • John A.
        • Glendenning A.C.
        • Marchant A.
        • et al.
        Self-harm, suicidal behaviours, and cyberbullying in children and young people: systematic review.
        J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20: e129
        • Pampati S.
        • Lowry R.
        • Moreno M.A.
        • et al.
        Having a sexual photo shared without permission and associated health risks: a snapshot of nonconsensual sexting.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2020; 174: 618-619
        • Anderson M.
        • Jiang J.
        Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018.
        Pew, Washington, DC2018
        • Boyle S.C.
        • LaBrie J.W.
        • Froidevaux N.M.
        • et al.
        Different digital paths to the keg? How exposure to peers' alcohol-related social media content influences drinking among male and female first-year college students.
        Addict Behav. 2016; 57: 21
        • Waterloo S.F.
        • Baumgartner S.E.
        • Peter J.
        • et al.
        Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp.
        New Media Soc. 2018; 20: 1813
        • Duggan M.
        Social networking fact sheet.
        Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC2013
        • Dhir A.
        • Torsheim T.
        • Pallesen S.
        • et al.
        Do online privacy concerns predict selfie behavior among adolescents, young adults and adults?.
        Front Psychol. 2017; 8: 815
        • Jenzen O.
        Trans youthsand social media: moving between counterpublics and the wider web.
        Gender Place Culture. 2017; 24: 1626
        • Craig S.L.
        • McInroy L.
        • McCready L.T.
        • et al.
        Connecting without fear: clinical implications of the consumption of information and communication technologies by sexual minority youthsand young adults.
        Clin Soc Work. 2015; 43: 159
        • Haferkamp N.
        • Kramer N.C.
        Social comparison 2.0: examining the effects of online profiles on social-networking sites.
        Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011; 14: 309
        • Senft T.M.
        • Baym N.K.
        What does the selfie say? Investigating a global phenomenon.
        Int J Commun. 2015; 9: 1588
        • Manago A.M.
        • Ward L.M.
        • Lemm K.M.
        • et al.
        Facebook involvement, objectified body consciousness, body shame, and sexual assertiveness in college women and men.
        Sex Roles. 2015; 72: 1-14
        • Fredrickson B.L.
        • Roberts T.A.
        Objectification theory—toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks.
        Psychol Women Q. 1997; 21: 173
        • McKinley N.M.
        • Hyde J.S.
        The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale.
        Psychol Women Q. 2016; 20: 181
        • Murray M.
        • Maras D.
        • Goldfield G.S.
        Excessive time on social networking sites and disordered eating behaviors among undergraduate students: appearance and weight esteem as mediating pathways.
        Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016; 19: 709
        • Fardouly J.
        • Vartanian L.R.
        Negative comparisons about one's appearance mediate the relationship between Facebook usage and body image concerns.
        Body Image. 2015; 12: 82
        • Vanstrien T.
        • Frijters J.E.R.
        • Bergers G.P.A.
        • et al.
        The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior.
        Int J Eat Disord. 1986; 5: 295
        • Byron P.
        Troubling expertise: social media and young people’s sexual health.
        Commun Res Pract. 2015; 1: 322
        • Jones K.
        • Williams J.
        • Sipsma H.
        • et al.
        Adolescent and emerging adults' evaluation of a Facebook site providing sexual health education.
        Public Health Nurs. 2019; 36: 11
        • Aragao J.M.N.
        • Gubert F.D.A.
        • Torres R.A.M.
        • et al.
        The use of Facebook in health education: perceptions of adolescent students.
        Rev Bras Enferm. 2018; 71: 265
        • Dulli L.
        • Ridgeway K.
        • Packer C.
        • et al.
        An online support group intervention for adolescents living with HIV in Nigeria: a pre-post test study.
        JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018; 4: e12397
        • Cornelius J.B.
        • Whitaker-Brown C.
        • Neely T.
        • et al.
        Mobile phone, social media usage, and perceptions of delivering a social media safer sex intervention for adolescents: results from two countries.
        Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2019; 10: 29-37
        • Altshuler A.L.
        • Storey H.L.G.
        • Prager S.W.
        Exploring abortion attitudes of US adolescents and young adults using social media.
        Contraception. 2015; 91: 226
        • Motoki Y.
        • Miyagi E.
        • Taguri M.
        • et al.
        Comparison of different recruitment methods for sexual and reproductive health research: social media-based versus conventional methods.
        J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19: e73
      1. Human Rights Campaign. A call to action: LGBTQ youths need comprehensive sex education.
        • Evans Y.N.
        • Gridley S.J.
        • Crouch J.
        • et al.
        Understanding online resource use by transgender youthsand caregivers: a qualitative study.
        Transgend Health. 2017; 2: 129
        • Fox J.
        • Ralston R.
        Queer identity online: informal learning and teaching experiences of LGBTQ individuals on social media.
        Comput Hum Behav. 2016; 65: 635
        • DiNapoli J.M.
        • Garcia-Dia M.J.
        • Garcia-Ona L.
        • et al.
        A theory-based computer mediated communication intervention to promote mental health and reduce high-risk behaviors in the LGBT population.
        Appl Nurs Res. 2014; 27: 91
        • Ybarra M.L.
        • DuBois L.Z.
        • Parsons J.T.
        • et al.
        Online focus groups as an HIV prevention program for gay, bisexual, and queer adolescent males.
        AIDS Educ Prev. 2014; 26: 554
        • Mustanski B.
        • Greene G.J.
        • Ryan D.
        • et al.
        Feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of an online sexual health promotion program for LGBT youth: the Queer Sex Ed intervention.
        J Sex Res. 2015; 52: 220