Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 34, ISSUE 4, P522-524, August 2021

A Pilot Study to Understand the Adolescent Pain Experience During Contraceptive Implant Insertion

  • S.D. Bentsianov
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to: Sari Bentsianov, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent & Young Adult Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 90 Bergen Street, Suite 4600, Newark, NJ 07103. Phone: (973) 972-2522; fax: (973) 972-9966.
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent & Young Adult Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
    Search for articles by this author
  • K. Brandi
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Women's Health, Division of Family Planning, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
    Search for articles by this author
  • P. Chen
    Affiliations
    Department of Family Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
    Search for articles by this author
  • N. Shimoni
    Affiliations
    Department of Family Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 27, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2021.01.013

      ABSTRACT

      Purpose

      In adolescents, concrete thinking may present as avoidance of an immediate, painful or uncomfortable experience despite long-term benefits, which may affect contraceptive choice. In this pilot study, we sought to better understand the pain that adolescents and young adults experience during contraceptive implant insertion.

      Materials and Methods

      In this cohort study, we surveyed 30 adolescents and young adults at their implant insertion visit about pre-procedure anxiety and pain experienced during lidocaine injection and Nexplanon™ placement.

      Results

      The average pre-procedure anxiety (Visual Analog Scale−Anxiety) score was 40 ± 29 mm. The average pain reported during lidocaine injection was 19 ± 21 mm and 6 ± 11 mm for implant insertion. Pre-procedure anxiety was not associated with pain during lidocaine injection (P = .61) or implant placement (P = .85).

      Conclusion

      Pain scores were low with both lidocaine injection and implant placement. Pre-procedure anxiety did not predict pain during lidocaine or implant placement. Patients considering an implant should be reassured by these data.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Blakemore S.J.
        • Robbins T.W.
        Decision-making in the adolescent brain.
        Nat Neurosci. 2012; 15: 1184
        • Clark S.J.
        • Cowan A.E.
        • Filipp S.L.
        • et al.
        Understanding non-completion of the human papillomavirus vaccine series: parent-reported reasons for why adolescents might not receive additional doses, United States.
        Public Health Rep. 2012; 131: 390
        • Baxter A.L.
        • Cohen L.L.
        • Burton M.
        • et al.
        The number of injected same-day preschool vaccines relates to preadolescent needle fear and HPV uptake.
        Vaccine. 2017; 35: 4213
        • Eaton K.D.
        • Kann L.
        • Kinchen S.
        • et al.
        Youth risk behavior surveillance–United States, 2017.
        MMWR Surveil Summ. 2018; 67: 1
        • Weisman C.S.
        • Plichta S.
        • Nathanson C.A.
        • et al.
        Adolescent women's contraceptive decision making.
        Am Sociol Assoc Stable. 2017; 32: 130
        • Darney P.
        Urban adolescent females’ views on the implant and contraceptive decision-making: a double paradox.
        Family Plan Perspect. 1997; 29: 167
        • Rubin S.E.
        • Felsher M.
        • Korich F.
        • et al.
        Urban adolescents’ and young adults’ decision-making process around selection of intrauterine contraception.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016; 29: 234
        • Callahan D.G.
        • Garabedian L.F.
        • Harney K.F.
        • et al.
        Will it hurt? The intrauterine device insertion experience and long-term acceptability among adolescents and young women.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019; 32: 615
        • Facco E.
        • Stellini E.
        • Bacci C.
        • et al.
        Validation of visual analogue scale for anxiety (VAS-A) in preanesthesia evaluation.
        Minerva Anestesiol. 2013; 79: 1388
      1. United States Census Bureau, QuickFacts Newark city, New Jersey. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/newarkcitynewjersey, US/PST045219, November 24, 2020.

        • Mestad R.
        • Secura G.
        • Allsworth J.E.
        • et al.
        Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.
        Contraception. 2011; 84: 493