Advertisement

Dual Protection Messaging for Adolescents and Young Adults in the Setting of Over-the-Counter Hormonal Contraception: A Human-Centered Design Approach

Published:August 28, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2022.08.009

      ABSTRACT

      Study Objective

      To use human-centered design approaches to engage adolescents and young adults in the creation of messages focused on dual method use in the setting of over-the-counter hormonal contraception access

      Design

      Baseline survey and self-directed workbooks with human-centered design activities were completed. The workbooks were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative methods to determine elements of the communication model, including sender, receiver, message, media, and environment.

      Setting

      Indiana and Georgia

      Participants

      People aged 14-21 years in Indiana and Georgia

      Interventions

      Self-directed workbooks

      Main Outcome Measures

      Elements of the communication model, including sender, receiver, message, media, and environment

      Results

      We analyzed 54 workbooks, with approximately half from each state. Stakeholders self-identified as female (60.5%), white (50.9%), Hispanic (10.0%), sexually active (69.8%), and heterosexual (79.2%), with a mean age of 18 years. Most strongly agreed (75.5%) that they knew how to get condoms, but only 30.2% expressed the same sentiment about hormonal contraception. Exploration of the elements of the communication model indicated the importance of crafting tailored messages to intended receivers. Alternative terminology for dual protection, such as “Condom+____,” was created.

      Conclusion

      There is a need for multiple and diverse messaging strategies about dual method use in the context of over-the-counter hormonal contraception to address the various pertinent audiences as this discussion transitions outside of traditional clinical encounters. Human-centered design approaches can be used for novel message development.

      Key Words

      Abbreviations:

      AYAs (adolescents and young adults), OTC (over-the-counter), STI (sexually transmitted infection), RJ (Research Jam)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Finer LB
        • Zolna MR
        Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 843-852https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1506575
        • Lindberg LD
        • Santelli JS
        • Desai S
        Changing patterns of contraceptive use and the decline in rates of pregnancy and birth among U.S. adolescents, 2007–2014.
        J Adolesc Health. 2018; 63: 253-256https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.05.017
        • Grossman D
        • Grindlay K
        • Li R
        • et al.
        Interest in over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives among women in the United States.
        Contraception. 2013; 88: 544-552https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2013.04.005
        • Sindhu KK
        • Adashi EY
        Over-the-counter oral contraceptives to reduce unintended pregnancies.
        JAMA. 2020; 324: 939-940https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.21862
      1. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2020. 2020. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2020/tables.htm. Accessed June, 2, 2020.

        • El Ayadi AM
        • Rocca CH
        • Kohn JE
        • et al.
        The impact of an IUD and implant intervention on dual method use among young women: Results from a cluster randomized trial.
        Prev Med. 2017; 94: 1-6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.015
        • Higgins JA
        • Smith NK
        • Sanders SA
        • et al.
        Dual method use at last sexual encounter: a nationally representative, episode-level analysis of US men and women.
        Contraception. 2014; 90: 399-406https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.06.003
        • Pazol K
        • Kramer MR
        • Hogue CJ
        Condoms for dual protection: patterns of use with highly effective contraceptive methods.
        Public Health Rep. 2010; 125: 208-217https://doi.org/10.1177/003335491012500209
        • Eisenberg DL
        • Allsworth JE
        • Zhao Q
        • Peipert JF
        Correlates of dual-method contraceptive use: an analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth (2006-2008).
        Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2012; (2012)717163https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/717163
        • Brown JL
        • Hennessy M
        • Sales JM
        • et al.
        Multiple method contraception use among African American adolescents in four US cities.
        Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 2011765917https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/765917
      2. STDs in Adolescent and Young Adults. 2017. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2017. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats17/adolescents.htm#ref1. Accessed June 2, 2020.

        • Kottke M
        • Whiteman MK
        • Kraft JM
        • et al.
        Use of dual methods for protection from unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases in adolescent African American women.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015; 28: 543-548https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2015.04.008
        • Ott MA
        • Adler NE
        • Millstein SG
        • et al.
        The trade-off between hormonal contraceptives and condoms among adolescents.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002; 34: 6-14
        • Manski R
        • Kottke M
        A survey of teenagers' attitudes toward moving oral contraceptives over the counter.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015; 47: 123-129https://doi.org/10.1363/47e3215
        • Lopez LM
        • Stockton LL
        • Chen M
        • et al.
        Behavioral interventions for improving dual-method contraceptive use.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; Cd010915https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010915.pub2
        • Forsythe LP
        • Ellis LE
        • Edmundson L
        • et al.
        Patient and stakeholder engagement in the PCORI pilot projects: description and lessons learned.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2016; 31: 13-21https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z
      3. Frampton S, Guastello S, Hoy L, et al: Harnessing evidence and experience to change culture: a guiding framework for patient and family engaged care: a discussion paper. 2017. Available: https://nam.edu/harnessing-evidence-and-experience-to-change-culture-a-guiding-framework-for-patient-and-family-engaged-care/

        • Domecq JP
        • Prutsky G
        • Elraiyah T
        • et al.
        Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14: 89https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-89
        • Raymond EG
        • Stewart F
        • Weaver M
        • et al.
        Impact of increased access to emergency contraceptive pills: a randomized controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 1098-1106https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000235708.91572.db
        • IDBM Program
        IDBP Papers.
        (Volume 1) Aalto University, Espoo, Finland2011
        • Searl MM
        • Borgi L
        • Chemali Z
        It is time to talk about people: a human-centered healthcare system.
        Health Res Policy Syst. 2010; 8: 35https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-8-35
        • Jones JHC
        • Thornley DG
        Conference on Design Methods.
        Pergamon Press, New York, NY1963
        • Matheson GO
        • Pacione C
        • Shultz RK
        • Klugl M
        Leveraging human-centered design in chronic disease prevention.
        Am J Prev Med. 2015; 48: 472-479https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.014
        • Bindman AB
        The evolution of health services research.
        Health Serv Res. 2013; 48: 349-353https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12051
        • Sanders EBN
        Postdesign and Participatory Culture. Presented at: Proceedings of Useful and Critical: The Position of Research in Design.
        Helsinki: University of Art and Design, 1999
      4. (Edited by)
        • Sanders EWC
        Harnessing people's creativity: ideation and expression through visual communication.
        in: Langford J McDonagh D Focus Groups: Supporting Effective Product Development. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida2003
        • Fiske J
        Introduction to Communication Studies.
        Studies in Culture and Communication. 2nd ed. Routledge, London, UK1990
        • Shannon CE
        A mathematical theory of communication.
        Bell Syst Tech J. 1948; 27: 379-423https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
        • Sanders EBN
        • Stappers PJ
        Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning.
        CoDesign. 2014; 10: 5-14https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183
      5. Sanders EB-N, Stappers PJ: Convivial toolbox: generative research for the front end of design. Amsterdam: BIS Publishing, 2013. https://www.bispublishers.com/convivial-toolbox.html.

        • Kolko J
        Exposing the Magic of Design: A Practitioner's Guide to the Methods and Theory of Synthesis.
        Oxford Series in Human-Technology Interaction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England2011
        • Kumar A
        • Maskara S
        • Chiang IJ
        Building a prototype using human-centered design to engage older adults in healthcare decision-making.
        Work (Reading, Mass). 2014; 49: 653-661https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-131695
        • Couture B
        • Lilley E
        • Chang F
        • et al.
        Applying user-centered design methods to the development of an mHealth application for use in the hospital setting by patients and care partners.
        Appl Clin Inform. 2018; 9: 302-312https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1645888
        • Harte R
        • Glynn L
        • Rodríguez-Molinero A
        • et al.
        A human-centered design methodology to enhance the usability, human factors, and user experience of connected health systems: a three-phase methodology.
        JMIR Hum Factors. 2017; 4 (e8)https://doi.org/10.2196/humanfactors.5443
        • Eberhart A
        • Slogeris B
        • Sadreameli SC
        • Jassal MS
        Using a human-centered design approach for collaborative decision-making in pediatric asthma care.
        Public Health. 2019; 170: 129-132https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.004
        • Witteman HO
        • Dansokho SC
        • Colquhoun H
        • et al.
        User-centered design and the development of patient decision aids: protocol for a systematic review.
        Syst Rev. 2015; 4 (11)https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-11
        • Gilliam M
        • Woodhams E
        • Sipsma H
        • Hill B
        Perceived dual method responsibilities by relationship type among African-American male adolescents.
        J Adolesc Health. 2017; 60: 340-345https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.10.017
        • Besera G
        • Moskosky S
        • Pazol K
        • et al.
        Male attendance at Title X family planning clinics - United States, 2003-2014.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016; 65: 602-605https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6523a3
        • Widman L
        • Evans R
        • Javidi H
        • Choukas-Bradley S
        Assessment of parent-based interventions for adolescent sexual health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        JAMA Pediatrics. 2019; 173: 866-877https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.2324