Abstract
Study Objective
Design
Setting
Participants
Intervention
Main Outcome Measures
Results
Conclusion
Key Words
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent GynecologyReferences
- Intended and unintended pregnancy worldwide in 2012 and recent trends.Stud Fam Plan. 2010; 41: 241-250
- Hormonal and intrauterine methods for contraception for women aged 25 years and younger.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; CD009805
- Prenatal care in Brasil.Cad Saude Publica. 2014; 30 (S1-15)
- Preventing unintended pregnancy: the Contraceptive CHOICE project in review.J Womens Health. 2015; 24: 349-353
- Contraceptive failure in the United States.Contraception. 2011; 83: 397-404
- Summary: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices.Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131: 947-948
- Committee Opinion No 699: Adolescent pregnancy, contraception, and sexual activity.Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129: e142-e149
- Contraception for adolescents.Pediatrics. 2014; 134: e1244-e1256
- Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescence.JAMA Pediatr. 2017; 171: 694-701
- Sexual and reproductive health care: a position paper of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine.J Adolesc Health. 2014; 54: 491-496
Tyson N, Berlan E, Hewit G, et al: Provision of reproductive health for teens during a pandemic. 2022. Available: https://www.naspag.org/naspag-provision-of-reproductive-health-for-teens-during-pandemic. Accessed April 26, 2022
- The cost-effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in the UK: analysis based on a decision-analytic model developed for a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guideline.Hum Reprod. 2008; 23: 1338-1345
- Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States.Contraception. 2009; 79: 5-14
Daniels K, Abma JC: Current contraceptive status among women aged 15-49: United States, 2015-2017 (NCHS Data Brief No 327)
- Barriers and facilitators to adolescents' use of long-acting reversible contraceptives.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017; 30: 18-22
- Barriers and solutions to improve adolescent intrauterine device access.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019; 32: S7-S13
Contracepção reversível de longa ação: São Paulo: Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO). 2016. ISSN 2525-6416 NLM WP630 Série orientações e recomendações FEBRASGO. v. 3, n.1, Nov. 2016
- Continuation rates of the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system according to the primary reason for its use.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021; 43: 291-296
- Intrauterine contraception for adolescents aged 14-18 years: a multicenter randomized pilot study of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system compared to the Copper T 380A.Contraception. 2010; 81: 123-127
- Intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women: a prospective survey.J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2016; 42: 36-42
- Five-year contraceptive efficacy and safety of a levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine system.Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133: 63-70
- Characteristics associated with discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraception within the first 6 months of use.Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122: 1214-1221
- Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use-5th ed 2015.WHO, Geneva2010
- Satisfaction with the intrauterine device insertion procedure among adolescent and young adult women.Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131: 1130-1136
- Ease of insertion and clinical performance of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in nulligravidas.Contraception. 2011; 84: e11-e16
- Young age, nulliparity, and continuation of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: 823-829
- Usage of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in adolescence: what is the evidence so far?.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017; 295: 529-541
- Association of age and parity with intrauterine device expulsion.Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124: 718-726
- Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016; 74 (945-73.e33)
- Hormonal intrauterine devices and acne.Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 139: 919-921
- Bleeding patterns and clinical performance of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) up two years.Contraception. 2002; 65: 129-132
- Bleeding pattern and user satisfaction in second consecutive levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system users: results of a prospective 5-years study.Hum Reprod. 2014; 29: 1182-1188
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest Statement: The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of the authors. ALLP have acted as consultants to Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and have received consultancy honoraria.