ABSTRACT
Study Objective
Design
Setting
Participants
Interventions
Main Outcome Measure
Results
Conclusions
Key Words
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent GynecologyReferences
- Adnexal masses in children and adolescents.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 58: 76-92
- The multidisciplinary approach to ovarian tumours in children and adolescents.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019; 243: 103-110
- Ovarian masses in children: a review of 91 cases of malignant and benign masses.J Pediatr Surg. 1993; 28: 930-932
- A retrospective review of the effect of surgeon specialty on the management of 190 benign and malignant pediatric and adolescent adnexal masses.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011; 24: 282-285
- Ovarian surface epithelial neoplasms in the pediatric population: incidence, histologic subtype, and natural history.Am J Surg Pathol. 2013; 37: 548-553
- Can we preoperatively risk stratify ovarian masses for malignancy?.J Pediatr Surg. 2010; 45: 130-134
- Preoperative risk stratification of children with ovarian tumors.J Pediatr Surg. 2016; 51: 1507-1512
- Selecting treatment method for ovarian masses in children - 24 years of experience.J Ovarian Res. 2017; 10: 59
- The role of preoperative imaging and tumor markers in predicting malignant ovarian masses in children.Pediatr Surg Int. 2020; 36: 333-339
- Multicenter pre-operative assessment of pediatric ovarian malignancy.J Pediatr Surg. 2019; 54: 1921-1925
- Ovarian masses in the child and adolescent: an American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee systematic review.J Pediatr Surg. 2019; 54: 369-377
- Use of risk of malignancy index to indicate frozen section analysis in the surgical care of women with ovarian tumors.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016; 133: 355-358
- Validation of models to diagnose ovarian cancer in patients managed surgically or conservatively: multicentre cohort study.BMJ. 2020; 370: m2614
- Pediatric borderline ovarian tumors: a retrospective analysis.J Pediatr Surg. 2010; 45: 1955-1960
- Right carotid artery ligation in neonates: classification of collateral flow with color doppler imaging.Radiology. 1990; 175: 117-123
Ovarian Cancer. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2022
- Clinical view of gynecologic intraoperative frozen section diagnosis.Gynecol Obstet Clin Med. 2022; 2: 6-8
- True” versus “apparent” stage I epithelial ovarian cancer value of frozen section analysis.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006; 16: 41-46
- Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of ovarian tumors.Gynecol Oncol. 2001; 81: 230-232
- Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of the adnexal mass: a metaanalysis.Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 96: 1-9
- Validity of intraoperative diagnosis at laparoscopic surgery for ovarian tumors.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 21: 576-579
- Accuracy of frozen-section analysis in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors: a systematic quantitative review.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005; 15: 192-202
- Diagnostic discordance in intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of ovarian tumors: a literature review and analysis of 871 cases treated at a Japanese cancer center.Int J Surg Pathol. 2021; 29: 30-38
- Ovarian preservation from tumors and torsions in girls: prospective diagnostic study.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017; 30: 405-412
- Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section analysis in borderline tumors of the ovary: a retrospective analysis of 96 cases and review of the literature.Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 107: 248-252
- The diagnostic value of frozen section for borderline ovarian tumours.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016; 36: 626-630
- Frozen section diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors with suspicious features of invasive cancer is a devil's dilemma for the surgeon: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021; 100: 1369-1376
- Accuracy of frozen section in diagnosis of ovarian mass.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004; 14: 212-219
- Accuracy of frozen-section (intraoperative consultation) diagnosis of ovarian tumors.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 171: 823-826
- Intraoperative frozen section analysis for the diagnosis of early stage ovarian cancer in suspicious pelvic masses.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 3CD010360
- The impact of size of the adnexal mass on the accuracy of frozen section diagnosis.Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 99: 362-366
- The role of frozen section evaluation in the diagnosis of adnexal mass.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008; 18: 235-240
- Factors influencing the use and accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of epithelial ovarian tumors.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199 (e241-247): 244
- Frozen section diagnoses of 578 ovarian tumors made by pathologists with and without expertise on gynecologic pathology.Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 123: 43-46
- How accurate is intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors?.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013; 39: 710-713
- Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section for the evaluation of ovarian neoplasms: an institutional experience.World J Surg Oncol. 2016; 14: 91
- Variability in surgical management of benign ovarian neoplasms in children.J Pediatr Surg. 2017; 52: 944-950
- Surgical management of benign adnexal masses in the pediatric/adolescent population: an 11-year review.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017; 30: 123-127
- Ovary-sparing surgery for benign pediatric ovarian masses.Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019; 31: 386-390
- Using quality improvement methodology to improve ovarian salvage for benign ovarian masses.J Pediatr Surg. 2017; 53: 67-72
Article info
Publication history
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
Conflict of Interest Statement: All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures, including financial, consultant, institutional, and other relationships that could lead to bias or conflicts of interest.
The findings of this study were presented at the NASPAG 36th Annual Clinical & Research Meeting on April 7th, 2022, in Chicago, Illinois.