Advertisement

Reproductive Justice and Adolescents in a Post-Roe United States

        The US Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson reversed nearly 50 years of legal precedent following the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973. This decision was an assault on reproductive justice that disproportionately impacts adolescents and young adults. The decision allowed states to enact laws curtailing induced abortions; in some states trigger laws had been enacted prior to the overturn of Roe v. Wade leading to an almost immediate ban on abortions. Some of these laws have been enjoined from enforcement, but others have gone into effect. Other states are in the process of enacting laws to protect abortion rights and access. The “abortion landscape” has been described as fragmented and increasingly polarized. An interactive map, available and regularly updated by the Guttmacher Institute at https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/, illustrates state-specific abortion policies, describing laws that range from most restrictive to most protective of abortion rights. Clinicians well know how to access this information, but accessing comprehensive reproductive healthcare which includes abortion access has long been a challenge for adolescents and young adults (AYA). Imagine the 14 year old who is unexpectedly pregnant, and unaware of where to seek help or what the laws are in her state.
        To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

        Purchase one-time access:

        Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
        One-time access price info
        • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
        • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

        Subscribe:

        Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
        Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
        Already an online subscriber? Sign in
        Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

        References

          • Kortsmit K.
          • et al.
          Abortion Surveillance—United States, 2019.
          MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021; 70: 1-29
          • World Health Organization
          Medical Management of Abortion.
          WHO, Editor, Geneva2018
        1. Verma, N., et al., Society of Family Planning Interim Clinical Recommendations: Self-managed Abortion. 2022.

          • Zernike K.
          Medical Impact of Roe Reversal Goes Well Beyond Abortion Clinics, Doctors Say.
          The New York Times. New York Times, New York, New York2022
          • Yousry F.
          Side Effects Public Media.
          Indiana's New Abortion Ban May Drive Some Young OB-GYNs to Leave a State Where They're Needed. NPR, Kaiser Health News, 2022
          • Rowland C.
          A Challenge for Antiabortion States: Doctos Reluctant to Work There.
          The Washington Post. The Washington Post, Washington DC2022
          • Goldstein D.
          • Sasani A.
          What New Abortion Bans Mean for the Youngest Patients.
          The New York Times. New York Times, New York, New York2022
          • Goodreau S.M.
          • et al.
          Declines in Pregnancies among U.S. Adolescents from 2007 to 2017: Behavioral Contributors to the Trend.
          J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2022; 35: 676-684
          • De Silva D.A.
          • Gleason J.L.
          Affordable Care Act (ACA) implementation and adolescent births by insurance type: An interrupted time series analysis of births between 2009 and 2017 in the United States.
          J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2022; 35: 685-691
          • Kale M.
          • et al.
          Normalizing Normal in Medical Education: A Call to Action.
          J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2022; 35: 612-613
          • Harrison M.E.
          • et al.
          NASPAG Position Statement: Eliminating Period Poverty in Adolescents and Young Adults Living in North America.
          J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2022; 35: 609-611