Advertisement

Unique Evaluation and Management Considerations for Adolescents with Late Gynecologic and Colorectal Issues in the Setting of Anorectal Malformations

Published:December 16, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2022.12.002

      Abstract

      Study Objective

      There is little guidance for managing pubertally identified Mullerian anomalies in patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs). We sought to assess these unique issues.

      Design

      Retrospective review

      Setting

      Single-institution study

      Participants

      Natal female patients aged 10-25, with an ARM, cloaca, or exstrophy, who presented from 2009 to 2019 with a gynecologic concern were included.

      Intervention

      Data collection was performed and included the presenting problem, psychological evaluation, fertility and sexuality concerns, and management strategies for these problems.

      Main Outcome Measures

      The main outcome was unique needs that had to be addressed in the young adult population and the type of colorectal and gynecological procedures needed on representation.

      Results

      Twelve patients were identified; all had gynecologic concerns. Ten had ARMs, including cloaca (n = 3) and cloacal exstrophy (n = 5). Median age at representation was 14.6 years (IQR = 12.7, 15.3). Colorectal revisions included posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (n = 1), resection of bowel attached to urogenital sinus (n = 1), and appendicostomy revision (n = 1). Gynecologic issues included dysmenorrhea (n = 8), obstructed Mullerian anomaly (n = 6), and introital stenosis (n = 5). Behavioral health concerns (n = 9) and fertility/sexuality concerns (n = 4) were identified. Median time from first visit to reconstruction was 1.5 years (IQR = 0.5, 1.5), providing multiple visits to achieve consensus among patients and providers before intervention, including vaginal or introital repair (n = 5) and hysterectomy of obstructed uterine horns (n = 3).

      Conclusions

      Goal-directed follow-up is required before surgical management to identify psychological and reproductive issues in patients with ARMs who have gynecologic concerns. Patient input and psychologic consultation are helpful for patients requiring staged reconstruction.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Versteegh HP
        • van Rooij IALM
        • Levitt MA
        • et al.
        Long-term follow-up of functional outcome in patients with a cloacal malformation: a systematic review.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2013; 48: 2343-2350
        • Acker S
        • Pena A
        • Wilcox D
        • et al.
        Transition of care: a growing concern in adult patients born with colorectal anomalies.
        Pediatr Surg Int. 2019; 35: 233-237
        • Levitt MA
        • Stein DM
        • Pena A:
        Gynecologic concerns in the treatment of teenagers with cloaca.
        J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33: 188-193
        • Levitt MA
        • Pena A:
        Cloacal malformations: lessons learned from 490 cases.
        Semin Pediatr Surg. 2010; 19: 128-138
        • Pradhan S
        • Vilanova-Sanchez A
        • McCracken KA
        • et al.
        The Mullerian Black Box: predicting and defining Mullerian anatomy in patients with cloacal abnormalities and the need for longitudinal assessment.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2018; 53: 2164-2169
        • Suson KD
        • Preece J
        • Di Carlo HN
        • et al.
        Complexities of Mullerian anatomy in 46XX cloacal exstrophy patients.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016; 29: 424-428
        • Rink RC
        • Herndon CDA
        • Cain MP
        • et al.
        Upper and lower urinary tract outcomes after surgical repair of cloacal malformations: a three-decade experience.
        BJU Inter. 2005; 96: 131-134
        • de Blaauw I
        • Midrio P
        • Breech B
        • et al.
        Treatment of adults with unrecognized or inadequately repaired anorectal malformations: 17 cases of rectovestibular and rectoperineal fistulas.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013; 26: 156-160
        • Lane VA
        • Skerritt C
        • Wood RJ
        • et al.
        A standardized approach for the assessment and treatment of internationally adopted children with a previously repaired anorectal malformation (ARM).
        J Pediatr Surg. 2016; 51: 1864-1870
        • Kaselas C
        • Philippopoulous A
        • Petropoulous A
        Evaluation of long-term functional outcomes after surgical treatment of anorectal malformation.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011; 26: 351-356
        • Baxter KL
        • Garza JM
        • Rollins MD
        • et al.
        Multi-institutional review of bowel management strategies in children with anorectal malformations.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2020; 55: 2752-2757